夜上海论坛 – 一个分享夜生活社区论坛

No Mo bear is coming again?

No Mo Xiong won the Lakers and equalized the big score, leaving himself not in the desperate situation of 0-2 going away. In the past, winning without Mo bear was not a new thing. There have been a lot of game samples proving that without Mo bear and with Mo bear are just two different forms of strong teams, even in the playoffs last year, no Mo bear puts more pressure on Warriors than no mo bear. However, the situation has changed this season. During the regular season, during Morant’s absence, no mo bear only won 11 and lost 10, which is completely different from the 20th and 5th of the previous season. No Mo Xiong’s combat power is based on the depth of the lineup, and it is not effective against any opponent. In some matches, the grizzly bear attack without Morant is very constipation. Without Adams and Clark, and without Morant, there were not many people the grizzly bear could use. Jenkins enabled Kang char, where G1 is not in regular rotation, in G2. Reusing G1 is only half a rotation of Roddy, which is actually a more risky choice. But Jenkins won the bet. Conchar gave two big eyebrows and front panel to make up the basket. When Dillon was trapped in foul, Roddy continued the intensity of confrontation to James and responded with three points after being emptied. This is fatal. In a constipation situation, which party threw the unexpected three points into the bureau is enough for the other party to drink a pot. Just as the strategy of the grizzly bear in G1 is to release the three points of the eight villages, and the strategy of the Lakers is also to release the three points of Dillon, Roddy and Tilman. The three men put in half of the three points in the match of the grizzly bear, this is enough to crush the Lakers. Of course, the three-point response of the rotation of the back section of the two benches without losing the chain and being emptied is far from the backbone of the grizzly bear. The other three things done well are more important: The first thing, X Factor Tillman. Tillman has made great progress this season. In addition to contributing admirable defense in some matches (such as anti-alphabet and anti-yokiki), his end also made progress, and occasionally there were some training balls. But objectively speaking, the existence of Tillman only made the grizzly bear less depressed about Adams’s injury. He was also an inside line with weak attack. He faced heavy eyebrows when he was present, the attack of the grizzly bear is just not easy to fight. What’s the result? Tillman did these things in this match: Fan Debiao, back-up singles; Block, remove, smooth and play with thick eyebrows; High-position control ball feeding air cutting; 5 front court rebounds; Make a three-pointer. Even if Adams was there, it would be a little bit of a hit like this. Tillman played well, some benefited from his teammates, and more were personal competitive status online. Of course, his contribution is not limited to attack, and his original strength of defense also played a great role. This is the second thing that grizzly bears have done well. The second thing is that Jenkins’s meticulous counterposition arrangement is full of defense. Tillman to heavy eyebrows, Dillon to James, these two people can break Zhan eyebrow relieve a garrison, no surprise. In the playoffs last year, the grizzly bear played against the Timberwolves. We have seen similar scenes. Bain can also play relieve a garrison against Russell. Russell can’t play relieve a garrison at all. Bain is reluctant to change his eyebrows. The grizzly bear can solve the problem by clamping. This is nothing special. The highlight is that when the Lakers took Vanderbilt and took the eight villages, they were ready to end the game, the grizzly bear was like this: Tillman defense James, 3J defense eyebrows, Dillon defense Reeves, Bain defense Russell, Jones Defense eight villages Jenkins finally realized that Reeves was the shots eldest brother of the Lakers? I’m not sure if Jenkins thinks so. Maybe he just doesn’t want 3J to play in the eight villages with three points in the match, or, he wanted to use Tillman to limit the high and low position of James who was frequently successful before the Lakers, so he arranged such a match. However, the objective result is that the single anti-arrow of the grizzly bear defends Reeves, and at the same time, the grizzly bear uses relieve a garrison to remove Reeves and the inner line, this made it difficult for Reeves to develop and collect the ball, and also made James unable to play high and low positions. The response that the Lakers should give at this time was to attack Jones around the advantage of the eight villages, but Hamm did not immediately respond. This is not surprising, it belongs to normal play. G1 was hit by the Lakers defender, and Jenkins thought bitterly. G2 was very targeted for the defense layout of the two Lakers starting games. Russell sleepwalks all the time, and Reeves is not as good as G1. The strict defense of heavy eyebrows in the low position has been continuing and can be expected, which makes the Lakers attack fall into the rhythm of James’s tough attack. When 3J released Vanderbilt to guard the basket and Dillon/Roddy/Bain gave enough counterstrength, James was hard to fight. On the other hand, is it easy to attack the grizzly bear? The third thing is that the grizzly bear is smarter than G1 in the back court. In addition to Tillman’s over-level performance, Kennard shot accurately, and the efficiency of other core rotation of the grizzly bear was not high. The real hit rates of Bain, Jones and Dillon are no more than 45%, and the efficiency of 3J is not bad, but it is not as unsolvable as G1. However, I still think the attack of the core rotation of the grizzly bear is good-constipation, which is more important than efficiency. Jones has a deal, a throw, a breakthrough to attack the basket with the opportunity, and a feeding cake behind the Laker’s hand. This is what G1 Morant didn’t type-full tamping front, why do you hit a heavy eyebrow? Only when the ball holder, Terminator and shooter are linked can they truly test the high-level defense. G1 Lakers guards are smart, G2 grizzly guards are smart, Morant watched on the spot, and should learn some lessons. Bain’s three-point goal still hasn’t improved, but his value at the offensive end is still very high. The Lakers will attack him in some rounds. He has many mistakes, and it can not be done every time he breaks the goal. However, he still made two very wonderful game reading in the fourth quarter: For the first time, using the containment force to attract and attack the ball Tillman, let the latter go to freethrow line; For the second time, the Lakers changed to the opposite position, letting the eight villages face Tillman. At the same time, Russell moved to the front of Bain. Bain immediately made a tough breakthrough and went to freethrow line. This differential treatment is something Bain needs to stick. Yogueta can continue to do it, and the pressure on the development of the grizzly battle is much less. In addition to these three things, the grizzly bear has an advantage of extending from G1, which is the threat of 3J. Like G1, except for heavy eyebrows, others can’t resist 3J. The Lakers continued the G1 defensive match at the beginning, letting James to 3J, heavy eyebrows to Tillman, Morant was not there, Vanderbilt went to Jones right. In the second half, the Lakers changed the opposite position, James changed to Dillon, Vanderbilt went to 3J, and Russell went to the right Jones. In fact, whether it is James or Fan Debiao, including the eight villages that are replaced to prevent 3J, their effect of preventing 3J alone is not good. The advantage of changing the opposite position is to reduce James’s pressure, the disadvantage is that Russell is going to the front line to prevent Jones from being removed. These are not all, there is an interesting phenomenon-as long as 3J is beaten one-on-one, it won’t take long for ham to let his eyebrows go to 3J. I noticed and observed that it didn’t seem to be a random result of getting someone to retreat. This kind of counterposition is risky. Although the thick eyebrows can prevent the one-to-one of 3J, the grizzly bear will also let 3J go more than downtown when the thick eyebrows are against 3J, which will liberate the attack basket at other points. G2 gave me the feeling that Ham was not satisfied with the counterpoint method from beginning to end. In fact, this is a common problem on both sides. Just as the Lakers worry about who will go to 3J, James and Russell both want a simple match, so Dillon is not enough, and the grizzly bear will certainly not be able to hide Jones and Kennard all the way. Therefore, one theme of the game between the two sides must be to grasp the weakness of the opponent. The Lakers have some ground battles to open the situation in this game, relying on eating dislocation-the value of the eight villages has been played again. G1 is a three-point outbreak, G2 single eating dislocation, eight villages are very powerful. The Lakers need eight villages to continue to hit three points and one difficult hit, which is very important for them. If Morant continues to be absent, eight villages are worth more time and ending the lineup than Fan Debiao, who has too much space. However, the inner line combination of the eight villages of the Lakers + James was gradually found by the grizzly bear. Today, the defense at this time is a little tense, which is a hidden danger that Ham needs to be vigilant. In general, G2 looks more like what is expected in this round of series-constipation, suffocation, the two sides do their best for a goal, an unexpected three-point response or a hard solution to the middle distance, it may make your opponent breathless. This kind of suffocation is likely to continue. Both sides need to make fine attack and defense arrangements and try their best to catch the few weaknesses of opponents. The Lakers need to stand up again in the back court. Even if they cannot continue to rely on personal abilities, the things that should be done in puzzles cannot be vague. Russell’s fixed-point response was not effective, and Beasley’s cooperation with James’s naming was not successful, which was very hurt. Both parties may have a similar strange X factor: Jones opened against Reeves and ended against the eighth village. Kennard would also play against the Lakers defenders at some time. In turn, Zhan Mei would continue to face strong men. Judging from G1G2, it is easier to attack the weakness of grizzly bear directly than the core; Morant hard steel heavy eyebrows are not a good way. The grizzly bear is more likely to break the situation when 3J faces counterpositions other than heavy eyebrows, Jones’s blocking and dismantling when facing simple counterpositions, and Bain’s random response after attracting defense. After Morant’s return, can the grizzly bear give priority to playing reasonably? Tian Ji horse racing, see who wants to understand first.

More Stories